[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50091C75.9030601@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:53:09 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mgalbraith@...ell.com, mmokrejs@...d.natur.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [QUESTION ON BUG] the rcu stall issue could not be reproduced
On 07/20/2012 04:36 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:24:25PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 07/20/2012 02:41 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> My bug was fixed in March. There was an email thread about it when
>>> the merge window opened but I can't find it...
>> Hi, Dan
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Currently this issue won't appear because the
>> CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60, which is big enough to avoid the
>> warning info.
>>
>> So is this the fix you mentioned? or someone has find out the true
>> reason and fixed it?
>
> I don't think there was an email thread on the RCU stall issue after
> all. I'm not sure what how it was fixed.
>
> The 60 second time out would have still triggered with my bug. It
> was a complete system hang, the RCU stall message was just a
> debugging hint. I was hitting the bug every couple days reliably on
> all my systems.
I see, looks like the stall info in your case is caused by a different
reason which should already be handled.
I do think that this warning won't appear with a normal machine working
normally without any buggie driver or wrong deployment...
Let's see what I can get from other reporters ;-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists