linux-kernel - Re: [ 11/37] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342803898.2583.32.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:04:58 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [ 11/37] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation --
 again

On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 19:16 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> I'm thrilled to see this regression fix for stable@, but are we really
> really sure that it won't cause new regressions? 

Doug Smythies ran a ~68 hour test on it, running various synthetic loads
of various frequencies against it and comparing the reported load
averages against the expected values and found it to be 'good'.

This doesn't guarantee we won't find more 'interesting' problems in
there, but it does give me fair confidence in it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/