[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5009D8D8.6040509@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:16:56 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/25] memcg/slub: shrink dead caches
On 07/06/2012 12:16 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> In the slub allocator, when the last object of a page goes away, we
>> don't necessarily free it - there is not necessarily a test for empty
>> page in any slab_free path.
>
> This is the same btw in SLAB which keeps objects in per cpu caches and
> keeps empty slab pages on special queues.
>
>> This patch marks all memcg caches as dead. kmem_cache_shrink is called
>> for the ones who are not yet dead - this will force internal cache
>> reorganization, and then all references to empty pages will be removed.
>
> You need to call this also for slab to drain the caches and free the pages
> on the empty list.
>
Doesn't the SLAB have a time-based reaper for that?
That's why I was less concerned with the SLAB, but I can certainly call
it for both.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists