[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5009DBEC.5050505@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:30:04 -0600
From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: mjg@...hat.com, mikew@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
keescook@...omium.org, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
maxin.john@...il.com, rdunlap@...otime.net, matt.fleming@...el.com,
olof@...om.net, dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Shorten constant names for EFI variable attributes
On 07/20/2012 04:10 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 03:08 PM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
>> Replace very long constants for EFI variable attributes
>> with shorter and more convenient names. Also create an
>> alias for the current longer names so as to not break
>> compatibility with current API since these constants
>> are used by userspace programs. This patch depends on
>> patch <https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/13/313>.
>
> I think these some from the EFI specifcation, so NAK IMO.
>
> -hpa
>
This patch is based upon earlier discussion at
<https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/13/320>.
You are right that EFI specification uses exactly these long names for
the constants, but does that mean kernel must also use the exact same
long constant names? I can see doing that for the sake of consistency.
At the same time, can we make the kernel code more readable and retain
compatibility with existing API by using aliases? I slightly prefer
making kernel code more readable, but I could go either way.
--
Khalid Aziz
khalid.aziz@...com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists