linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with the slave-dma tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120722114409.2437cbc5ad4835dd99089e6d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:44:09 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with the slave-dma tree

Hi Chris,

Today's linux-next merge of the mmc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c between commits 916001fe33b7 ("mmc: sh_mmcif:
remove unneeded struct sh_mmcif_dma, prepare to shdma conversion") and
0e79f9ae1610 ("mmc: sh_mmcif: switch to the new DMA channel allocation
and configuration") from the slave-dma tree and commit bf68a812f06c
("mmc: sh-mmcif: add OF support, make platform data optional") from the
mmc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
index 0f07d28,b2af713..0000000
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
@@@ -372,14 -376,17 +374,14 @@@ static void sh_mmcif_start_dma_tx(struc
  static void sh_mmcif_request_dma(struct sh_mmcif_host *host,
  				 struct sh_mmcif_plat_data *pdata)
  {
 -	struct sh_dmae_slave *tx, *rx;
 +	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(host->pd, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 +	struct dma_slave_config cfg;
 +	dma_cap_mask_t mask;
 +	int ret;
 +
  	host->dma_active = false;
  
- 	if (pdata->slave_id_tx <= 0 || pdata->slave_id_rx <= 0)
 -	if (!pdata)
++	if (!pdata || pdata->slave_id_tx <= 0 || pdata->slave_id_rx <= 0)
  		return;
  
  	/* We can only either use DMA for both Tx and Rx or not use it at all */

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped