linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 17/23] ARM: add machine desc hook for early memory/paging initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <500EB594.3000303@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:47:48 -0400
From:	Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@...com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nico@...aro.org>,
	<will.deacon@....com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 17/23] ARM: add machine desc hook for early memory/paging
 initialization

Thanks for looking at this, Arnd.

On 7/24/2012 10:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
>> index 0b1c94b..49e9c2a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct machine_desc {
>>                                           struct meminfo *);
>>          void                    (*reserve)(void);/* reserve mem blocks  */
>>          void                    (*map_io)(void);/* IO mapping function  */
>> +       void                    (*init_meminfo)(void);
>>          void                    (*init_early)(void);
>>          void                    (*init_irq)(void);
>>          struct sys_timer        *timer;         /* system tick timer    */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
>> index e15d83b..7cbe292 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -964,6 +964,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>>
>>          parse_early_param();
>>
>> +       if (mdesc->init_meminfo)
>> +               mdesc->init_meminfo();
>> +
>>          sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]), meminfo_cmp, NULL);
>>          sanity_check_meminfo();
>>          arm_memblock_init(&meminfo, mdesc);
>
> The function pointers in that structure are ordered by execution time,
> and you call init_meminfo just before ->reserve, so it should go there.
>

Sure.  Will update.

> I wonder if it's better to just do the setup in the reserve callback,
> which would be a slight abuse of that interface but also keep down
> the number of early callbacks.
>

We need to switch the phys offset before sanity_check_meminfo() mangles 
the meminfo banks.

If we were to do this switch over in reserve(), we'd need to go back and 
fixup things that happen between the current location and reserve(). 
For example, we'd need to fix up the memblock regions.

-- 
Thanks
- Cyril
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/