[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501025EC.6010600@mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:59:24 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>
CC: "Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@...com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] arm/dts: am33xx rtc node
Hello.
On 07/25/2012 06:09 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>>> + rtc@...3e000 {
>> Address postfix in the node name without "reg" property?
> As per [1], "The unit-address is included if the node describes
> a device with an address".
Which in this case it doesn't.
> Here even though reg property is not present, as via hwmod
> (see below) it is getting address, isn't it better to have it
I think not.
>>> + compatible = "ti,da830-rtc";
>>> + ti,hwmods = "rtc";
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists