[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120726114215.GB3099@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:42:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, sameo@...ux.intel.com, olalilja@...oo.se,
ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lrg@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/21] ASoC: io: Prevent use of regmap if request fails
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:38:17PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 26/07/12 12:32, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Again, this makes no sense. If we're explicitly being asked to use
> >regmap then we should be using regmap or just failing to set up I/O
> >(which is obviously a catastrophic failure).
> How much work is there involved in regmap:ing a device, so that
> dev_get_regmap() doesn't fail?
Trivial if it's on a supported bus, otherwise you just need to write the
bus. But why do you care if dev_get_regmap() fails? We only try to use
regmap if the driver asked for regmap I/O (or doesn't have registers at
all in which case it doesn't matter since we never do any I/O). What
you appear to be saying here is that you're using regmap on a device
which doesn't have a regmap set up which is clearly never going to work
terribly well...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists