[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501180A1.1000504@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:38:41 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: don't enable/disable signle step if the user
did it
On 07/26/2012 05:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index f935327..772eb3a 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1528,7 +1528,10 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
> if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
> - user_enable_single_step(current);
> + if (test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SINGLESTEP))
> + uprobe->flags |= UPROBE_USER_SSTEP;
> + else
> + user_enable_single_step(current);
After looking at it for a bit I noticed that the state should be saved
in utask intead of uprobe because uprobe might be shared with another
task.
I would resend the fixed patch unless someone comes up with something
else..
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists