[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1207271241580.26163@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:45:38 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/7] xen/mmu: Recycle the Xen provided L4,
L3, and L2 pages
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> As we are not using them. We end up only using the L1 pagetables
> and grafting those to our page-tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> index 48bdc9f..7f54b75 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> @@ -1724,6 +1724,9 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long max_pfn)
> {
> pud_t *l3;
> pmd_t *l2;
> + unsigned long addr[3];
> + unsigned long pt_base, pt_end;
> + unsigned i;
>
> /* max_pfn_mapped is the last pfn mapped in the initial memory
> * mappings. Considering that on Xen after the kernel mappings we
> @@ -1731,6 +1734,9 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long max_pfn)
> * set max_pfn_mapped to the last real pfn mapped. */
> max_pfn_mapped = PFN_DOWN(__pa(xen_start_info->mfn_list));
>
> + pt_base = PFN_DOWN(__pa(xen_start_info->pt_base));
> + pt_end = PFN_DOWN(__pa(xen_start_info->pt_base + (xen_start_info->nr_pt_frames * PAGE_SIZE)));
> +
> /* Zap identity mapping */
> init_level4_pgt[0] = __pgd(0);
>
> @@ -1749,6 +1755,9 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long max_pfn)
> l3 = m2v(pgd[pgd_index(__START_KERNEL_map)].pgd);
> l2 = m2v(l3[pud_index(__START_KERNEL_map)].pud);
>
> + addr[0] = (unsigned long)pgd;
> + addr[1] = (unsigned long)l2;
> + addr[2] = (unsigned long)l3;
> /* Graft it onto L4[272][0]. Note that we creating an aliasing problem:
> * Both L4[272][0] and L4[511][511] have entries that point to the same
> * L2 (PMD) tables. Meaning that if you modify it in __va space
> @@ -1791,12 +1800,29 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long max_pfn)
> __xen_write_cr3(true, __pa(init_level4_pgt));
> xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
>
> - /* Offset by one page since the original pgd is going bye bye */
> - memblock_reserve(__pa(xen_start_info->pt_base + PAGE_SIZE),
> - (xen_start_info->nr_pt_frames * PAGE_SIZE) - PAGE_SIZE);
> - /* and also RW it so it can actually be used. */
> - set_page_prot(pgd, PAGE_KERNEL);
> - clear_page(pgd);
> + /* We can't that easily rip out L3 and L2, as the Xen pagetables are
> + * set out this way: [L4], [L1], [L2], [L3], [L1], [L1] ... for
> + * the initial domain. For guests using the toolstack, they are in:
> + * [L4], [L3], [L2], [L1], [L1], order .. */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(addr); i++) {
> + unsigned j;
> + /* No idea about the order the addr are in, so just do them twice. */
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(addr); j++) {
I don't think I understand this double loop.
Shouldn't we be looping on pt_base or pt_end?
> + if (pt_base == PFN_DOWN(__pa(addr[j]))) {
> + set_page_prot((void *)addr[j], PAGE_KERNEL);
> + clear_page((void *)addr[j]);
> + pt_base++;
> +
> + }
> + if (pt_end == PFN_DOWN(__pa(addr[j]))) {
> + set_page_prot((void *)addr[j], PAGE_KERNEL);
> + clear_page((void *)addr[j]);
> + pt_end--;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + /* Our (by three pages) smaller Xen pagetable that we are using */
> + memblock_reserve(PFN_PHYS(pt_base), (pt_end - pt_base) * PAGE_SIZE);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists