[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <50129C030200007800090F9B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:47:47 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] xen/p2m: Add logic to revector a
P2M tree to use __va leafs.
>>> On 27.07.12 at 13:18, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> 1) All P2M lookups instead of using the __ka address would
>> use the __va address. This means we can safely erase from
>> __ka space the PMD pointers that point to the PFNs for
>> P2M array and be OK.
>> 2). Allocate a new array, copy the existing P2M into it,
>> revector the P2M tree to use that, and return the old
>> P2M to the memory allocate. This has the advantage that
>> it sets the stage for using XEN_ELF_NOTE_INIT_P2M
>> feature. That feature allows us to set the exact virtual
>> address space we want for the P2M - and allows us to
>> boot as initial domain on large machines.
>>
>> So we pick option 2).
>
> 1) looks like a decent option that requires less code.
> Is the problem with 1) that we might want to access the P2M before we
> have __va addresses ready?
AIUI 1) has no easy way of subsequently accommodating support
for XEN_ELF_NOTE_INIT_P2M (where you almost definitely will
want/need to reclaim the originally used VA space - if nothing else,
then for forward compatibility with the rest of the kernel).
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists