[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501610E0.8000504@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:43:12 +0800
From: Asias He <asias@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
On 07/28/2012 02:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what the correct behavior for bio & cacheflush is, if
>>> any.
>>
>> REQ_FLUSH is not supported in the bio path.
>
> Ouch, that's correct:
>
> @@ -414,7 +529,7 @@ static void virtblk_update_cache_mode(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> u8 writeback = virtblk_get_cache_mode(vdev);
> struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;
>
> - if (writeback)
> + if (writeback && !use_bio)
> blk_queue_flush(vblk->disk->queue, REQ_FLUSH);
> else
> blk_queue_flush(vblk->disk->queue, 0);
>
> then it is not safe against power losses.
Yes. Something like this:
qemu -drive file=foo.img,cache=writeback/unsafe
is not safe against power losses also?
I think we can add REQ_FLUSH & REQ_FUA support to bio path and that
deserves another patch.
--
Asias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists