linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH TRIVIAL] mm: Fix build warning in kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207310904370.2380@tux.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:05:36 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc:	shuah.khan@...com, cl@...ux.com, glommer@...allels.com,
	js1304@...il.com, shuahkhan@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH TRIVIAL] mm: Fix build warning in kmem_cache_create()

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> So much for compromise, I thought we had agreed that at least some of the 
> checks for !name, in_interrupt() or bad size values should be moved out 
> from under the #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, but this wasn't done.  This 
> discussion would be irrelevent if we actually did what we talked about.

I didn't want to change the checks at the last minute and invalidate 
testing in linux-next but I'm more than happy to merge such a patch when 
the merge window closes.

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/