lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:05:36 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc:	shuah.khan@...com, cl@...ux.com, glommer@...allels.com,
	js1304@...il.com, shuahkhan@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH TRIVIAL] mm: Fix build warning in kmem_cache_create()

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> So much for compromise, I thought we had agreed that at least some of the 
> checks for !name, in_interrupt() or bad size values should be moved out 
> from under the #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, but this wasn't done.  This 
> discussion would be irrelevent if we actually did what we talked about.

I didn't want to change the checks at the last minute and invalidate 
testing in linux-next but I'm more than happy to merge such a patch when 
the merge window closes.

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ