[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1207301904520.24929@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
cc: shuah.khan@...com, cl@...ux.com, glommer@...allels.com,
js1304@...il.com, shuahkhan@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH TRIVIAL] mm: Fix build warning in kmem_cache_create()
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > -Wunused-label is overridden in gcc for a label that is conditionally
> > referenced by using __maybe_unused in the kernel. I'm not sure what's so
> > obscure about
> >
> > out: __maybe_unused
> >
> > Are label attributes really that obsecure?
>
> I think they are.
>
> The real problem, however, is that label attributes would just paper
> over the badly thought out control flow in the function and not make the
> code any better or easier to read.
>
So much for compromise, I thought we had agreed that at least some of the
checks for !name, in_interrupt() or bad size values should be moved out
from under the #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, but this wasn't done. This
discussion would be irrelevent if we actually did what we talked about.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists