linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] onewire: w1-gpio: add ext_pullup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <501778DA.5020107@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:19:06 +0200
From:	Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
To:	Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@....fi>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, GregKH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] onewire: w1-gpio: add ext_pullup_enable pin in platform
 data

On 31.07.2012 02:59, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:12:39PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Sorry for long delay
>> [resend with fixed Greg's address :)]
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:54:29PM +0200, Daniel Mack (zonque@...il.com) wrote:
>>> In the process of porting boards to devicetree implemenation, we should
>>> keep information about external circuitry where they belong - the
>>> individual drivers.
>>>
>>> This patch adds a way to specify a GPIO to drive the (optional) external
>>> pull-up logic, rather than using a function pointer for that.
>>
>> I do not object against this patch, but I have rather limited knowledge
>> about gpio driver. Patch looks good, feel free to add my
>> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
>>
>> Greg, please pull it into your tree, if Ville does not object.
> 
> No objections from me.

I take this as an Acked-by:?

> The only cosmetic issue I spotted was 'pdata' being assigned twice in
> w1_gpio_probe().

Right. Amended patch below.


Thanks a lot,
Daniel




View attachment "0001-onewire-w1-gpio-add-DT-bindings.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3394 bytes)