[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120731124121.5fe10478@notabene.brown>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:41:21 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: "C. Schmid" <christian.schmid81@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Complaint - pid-owner Support Removed
(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER)
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:22:10 +0200 "C. Schmid" <christian.schmid81@....de>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i want to complain about the removal of the --pid-owner Support for
> iptables.
>
> As far as i understand it this support was just removed without replacement.
Yes, 7 years ago.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=34b4a4a624bafe089107966a6c56d2a1aca026d4
"Unfixably broken"
What problem are you trying to solve? I suspect you would be able to solve
it by dedicating a group-id to the program that you want to allow through the
firewall, and making sure it runs with that group-id.
(ignoring remainder of email as it seems to be more emotional than factual).
NeilBrown
>
> I would have expected, that if anything you would have improved the
> support for pid's and especially for desktop firewalls.
>
> But it seems that some rumors, like you only care for 'big iron' are not
> that easily dismissed.
>
> I would encourage you to at least try to keep up with essential feature
> support, especially when it comes to desktop firewalls (for example
> zonealarm).
>
> I believe focusing on server infrastucture while abandoning desktop
> infrastructure will not do much good in mid and long term.
>
>
>
> Sincerly
>
>
> Christian Schmid
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists