linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] clk: mmp: add clock definition for pxa168

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201208021030.19986.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:30:19 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com>
Cc:	haojian.zhuang@...il.com, mturquette@...aro.org,
	viresh.linux@...il.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	chao.xie@...vell.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] clk: mmp: add clock definition for pxa168

On Thursday 02 August 2012, Chao Xie wrote:
> > #define APBC_RTC       0x28
> >
> > apbc_clks[rtc_clk] = mmp_clk_register_apbc(rtc_clk, clk32k, APBC_RTC, 10, APBC_POWER_CTRL, mmp_clk_lock);
> > clk_register_clkdev(apbc_clks[rtc_clk], NULL, "sa1100-rtc");
> >
> >         Arnd
> >
> hi
> I would like to keep the mmp_clk_register_apbc to receive the "reg
> base" not "reg offset".
> It will be aligned with other kind of clock register APIs.
> To read out APBC base register from device tree can be added at the
> clock-pxa168.c, and it can map the registers and pass to the
> mmp_clk_register_apbc.

Right, my mistake.

The above should have been something like

#define APBC_RTC       0x28
apbc_clks[rtc_clk] = mmp_clk_register_apbc(rtc_clk, clk32k, clock_base + APBC_RTC, 10, APBC_POWER_CTRL, mmp_clk_lock);
clk_register_clkdev(apbc_clks[rtc_clk], NULL, "sa1100-rtc");

instead, with clock_base pointing to the __iomem token for the clock controller.

> Now, i have talked to Haojian who is doing device tree maintainer in
> pxa/mmp. This kind of support is not added.
> I suggest that after device tree support in clock can be added later
> after other functionality of the clock framework is fine.

You can do device tree support as a second step, but in this first step, you
should already start using ioremap to get the virtual address of the
clock controller, rather than hardcoding it.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/