linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched: fix migration thread runtime bogosity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:39:15 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix migration thread runtime bogosity

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:42 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I have two bug reports of absurd migration thread CPU usage, one of them
> with a link to a bisection..
> 
>      https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394487
> 
> ..fingering d670ec13 - posix-cpu-timers: Cure SMP wobbles
> 
> I reproduced with my -rt kernel and 3.4, but didn't manage to reproduce
> with the 3.0 NOPREEMPT kernel it was reported against.

Ah, I've seen similar reports, never managed to reproduce though.


> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 82ad284..82a78a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -974,6 +974,13 @@ void sched_set_stop_task(int cpu, struct task_struct *stop)
>  		sched_setscheduler_nocheck(stop, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
>  
>  		stop->sched_class = &stop_sched_class;
> +
> +		/* Zero stale values for our non-accountable thread. */
> +		stop->se.exec_start = 0;
> +		stop->se.sum_exec_runtime = 0;
> +		stop->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime = 0;
> +		stop->stime = stop->stimescaled = 0;
> +		stop->nvcsw = stop->nivcsw = 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	cpu_rq(cpu)->stop = stop;


Now the question is, how did that stop thing get any time to begin with?
Are we hotplugging or somesuch sillyness?


Anyway, I think I like B best, could you re-submit as a proper patch so
I can press the magic button that queues stuff?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/