lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:04:10 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>, Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>, Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>, Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] code_domain: New code domain tracking susbsystem On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:31:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:09:39PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 21:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Create a new subsystem that handles the probing on kernel > > > > boundaries to keep track of the transitions between code > > > > domains with two basic initial domains: user or kernel. > > > > > > To do a bit more bike shed painting, I'd call it "context > > > tracking" - user mode, kernel mode (guest mode, etc.). > > > > > > The term 'code domain' would bring up blank stares from most > > > kernel developers, me thinks. > > > > Heh, that would be a second new term I heard this week for context. > > Earlier, I noticed that Paul McKenney called it 'levels'. So now there's > > four names: > > > > user/kernel context > > user/kernel state > > user/kernel level > > user/kernel domain > > > > And we could probably add a fifth: > > > > user/kernel mode > > Plus: > > user/kernel space > > > ;-) > > Then there is "supervisor", "system", "privileged", and who knows what > all else for "kernel". And "application" and "problem" and probably > others for "user". Hehe. Ok I agree that domain already has a biased meaning in the kernel. So I'm going to respin with code_context_tracking. If anybody oppose, please raise your hand. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists