[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY6gmyhjaMyjk4XP99rLb=B7jGpc2tpGcDh6O4UdgxXVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:50:10 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: axel.lin@...il.com
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel WILLERUD <daniel.willerud@...ricsson.com>,
Mattias WALLIN <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: ab8500: Set enable enable_time in regulator_desc
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com> wrote:
> 2012/7/4 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:31:45AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Hi Linus,
>>> While working on this patch, I found in original code:
>>> ab8500_regulator_ops set enable_time callback to ab8500_regulator_enable_time,
>>> but does not set the delay in ab8500_regulator_info.
>>> I'm not sure the delay value is 0 for ab8500_regulator_ops, or the setting is
>>> just missing.
>>> Anyway, there is no behavior change by this patch.
>>
>> Surely if the delay is not set in info then it'll introduce a delay
>> which wasn't there before (but which may well be a bug fix)?
>
> Ping...
>
> Hi Linus,
> Any comments on this patch?
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
I need to check the proper rise times with the maintainers.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists