[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120806172406.GC31409@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:24:07 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between
DT and non-DT boots
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:02:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > > > + ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf;
> > > > + ponkey->irq_dbr = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr) : irq_dbr;
>
> > > Why this isn't done inside ab8500_irq_get_virq()?
>
> > There's no reason why it can't be.
>
> > My first version of the patch did just that in fact.
>
> > Would that be your preference?
>
> Restating my comment elsewhere... why do we even need to do this in
> _get_virq() - I'd *really* expect this to be handled by the irq domain
> code.
I really should stop reading my emails backwards. :)
I'll look into this tomorrow.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists