[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120806172204.GB31409@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:22:05 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between
DT and non-DT boots
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:00:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:46:42AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > If we're booting with Device Tree enabled, we want the IRQ numbers to
> > be taken and translated from the Device Tree binary. If not, they
> > should be taken from the resource allocation defined in the AB8500 MFD
> > core driver.
>
> > ponkey->ab8500 = ab8500;
> > - ponkey->irq_dbf = ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf);
> > - ponkey->irq_dbr = ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr);
> > +
> > + ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf;
> > + ponkey->irq_dbr = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr) : irq_dbr;
>
> Shouldn't the irq domain be coping with this? It seems like a massive
> failure to have to do this in every single user, the irq domain should
> be able to encapsulate all this stuff.
Already in hand.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists