linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] mfd: Use interrupt-parent as IRQ controller if specified in DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120806172109.GA31409@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:21:10 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mfd: Use interrupt-parent as IRQ controller if
 specified in DT

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:54:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:46:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > -				domain = irq_find_host(parent->of_node);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +				parent_node = of_irq_find_parent(np);
> > +#endif
> 
> Shouldn't of_irq_find_parent() be stubbed out by the header?  Every
> single user of this is going to need it.  Indeed, shouldn't we be making
> irq_find_host() just do this?

Sounds reasonable. I'll look into it tomorrow.
-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/