[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANaxB-xq_wDGZQ16nTD6agwc_JiE4dQe1fXmvmPZckAX0EVr9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:43:04 +0400
From: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: teach perf inject to merge sched_stat_* and
sched_switch events
Hello Arnaldo,
Thanks for comments, I will correct them. I need a bit more details
about two of them.
2012/8/6 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>:
>> @@ -21,6 +23,9 @@ static int output;
>> static u64 bytes_written;
>>
>> static bool inject_build_ids;
>> +static bool inject_sched_stat;
>> +
>> +struct perf_session *session;
perf_event__sched_stat (perf_inject.sample) uses "session" for getting
an event name. I don't know how to get it by another way
>
> Why do we need to insert even more globals?
>
>> static int perf_event__repipe_synth(struct perf_tool *tool __used,
>> union perf_event *event,
>> @@ -47,7 +52,7 @@ static int perf_event__repipe_synth(struct perf_tool *tool __used,
>>
>> static int perf_event__repipe_op2_synth(struct perf_tool *tool,
>> union perf_event *event,
>> - struct perf_session *session __used)
>> + struct perf_session *s __used)
>
> What is the point of the above hunk?
"session" is global, for this reason I renamed all arguments.
p.s. Arnaldo, sorry for the personal message with the same content.
It's my mistake.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists