linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: suppress printk if there is no real info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:16:42 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: suppress printk if there is no real info

On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:15:49PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 07:10:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > 	if (!buf[0])
> > > 		buf = "no parameters";

> > Yeah, having the log message for other regulators is helpful since
> > things often go boom after you mess with power but not so useful for
> > dummy.

> That's a +1 for which approach?

The above one which preserves the log message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/