[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120807181549.GF9888@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:15:49 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: suppress printk if there is no real info
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 07:10:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:18:40AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> > probably this really only applies to the dummy regulator. If not it
> > might be more sensible to do:
>
> > if (!buf[0])
> > buf = "no parameters";
>
> Yeah, having the log message for other regulators is helpful since
> things often go boom after you mess with power but not so useful for
> dummy.
That's a +1 for which approach?
> > or similar. Other than that I wonder if setting the devicename from
> > "dummy" to say "regulator-dummy" would be an improvement, too.
>
> That'd work too.
I'd like to combine it with one of the two suggested above.
If you answer my question I can follow up with a patch.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists