| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:55:31 +0100 From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@...com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: twl6040: Add twl6040-gpio child On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 05:13:17PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > If the board needs the gpo driver, but in the driver(s) I need to check for > the existence of the "ti,twl6040-gpo" node and check if the status is "okay". > I think it is easier to just get the value of "ti,use-gpo", if it exist and it > is 1 I enable the GPIO driver otherwise I don't. Will having the GPIO driver actually cause any problems if it's not in use? It's not like things like RTC which are directly visible to userspace and so can create problems if they're non-functional, unless it does something like grab resources that might be needed by another subfunction driver there's not really a substantial cost in just instantiating it (people who are really space pressured probably won't build the driver in in the first place). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists