[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5023A8AE.5050300@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:10:22 +0300
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: twl6040: Add twl6040-gpio child
On 08/09/2012 02:55 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 05:13:17PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>> If the board needs the gpo driver, but in the driver(s) I need to check for
>> the existence of the "ti,twl6040-gpo" node and check if the status is "okay".
>> I think it is easier to just get the value of "ti,use-gpo", if it exist and it
>> is 1 I enable the GPIO driver otherwise I don't.
>
> Will having the GPIO driver actually cause any problems if it's not in
> use? It's not like things like RTC which are directly visible to
> userspace and so can create problems if they're non-functional, unless
> it does something like grab resources that might be needed by another
> subfunction driver there's not really a substantial cost in just
> instantiating it (people who are really space pressured probably won't
> build the driver in in the first place).
Fair enough, I'll make the change for the v2.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists