linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] mm: introduce compaction and migration for virtio ballooned pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120809144835.GA2719@t510.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:48:36 -0300
From:	Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] mm: introduce compaction and migration for virtio
 ballooned pages

On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:00:19AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 07:53:19PM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > Memory fragmentation introduced by ballooning might reduce significantly
> > the number of 2MB contiguous memory blocks that can be used within a guest,
> > thus imposing performance penalties associated with the reduced number of
> > transparent huge pages that could be used by the guest workload.
> > 
> > This patch introduces the helper functions as well as the necessary changes
> > to teach compaction and migration bits how to cope with pages which are
> > part of a guest memory balloon, in order to make them movable by memory
> > compaction procedures.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
> 
> Mostly looks ok but I have one question;
> 
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > +/* putback_lru_page() counterpart for a ballooned page */
> > +bool putback_balloon_page(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	if (WARN_ON(!movable_balloon_page(page)))
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	if (likely(trylock_page(page))) {
> > +		if (movable_balloon_page(page)) {
> > +			__putback_balloon_page(page);
> > +			put_page(page);
> > +			unlock_page(page);
> > +			return true;
> > +		}
> > +		unlock_page(page);
> > +	}
> 
> You might have answered this already as I skipped over a few revisions
> and if you have, sorry about that and please add a comment :)
> 
> This trylock_page looks risky as it looks like it can fail if another
> process running compaction tries to isolate this page. It locks the page,
> finds it cant and releases the lock but in the meantime this trylock can
> fail. It triggers a WARN_ON so we'll get a bug report but it leaves the
> reference count elevated and this page has now leaked.
>
Good catch!
I had those bits changed to follow the same logics you had suggested for
isolate_balloon_page(), but I ended up completely missing this potential page
leak case you spotted. Thanks a lot!
 
> Why not just lock_page(page)? As you have already isolated this page you
> know that the lock is only going to be held by a parallel compacting
> process checking the reference count and the delay will be short. As a
> bonus you can drop the WARN_ON check in the caller and make this void as
> the WARN_ON check in the caller becomes redundant.
> 
Sure! 
what do you think of:

+/* putback_lru_page() counterpart for a ballooned page */
+void putback_balloon_page(struct page *page)
+{
+   lock_page(page);
+   if (!WARN_ON(!movable_balloon_page(page))) {
+           __putback_balloon_page(page);
+           put_page(page);
+   }
+   unlock_page(page);
+}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/