| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120808.231120.1626915346739960080.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:11:20 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: cjren@....qualcomm.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qca-linux-team@...lcomm.com, nic-devel@...lcomm.com, xiong@....qualcomm.com, hao-ran.liu@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com, rodrigue@....qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add new QCA alx ethernet driver From: "Ren, Cloud" <cjren@....qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 02:27:35 +0000 > The alx driver only supports two new nics(l1f/l2f) now. It doesn't supersede atl1c driver. > Atl1c driver still supports old nics. There is no worse act than quoting a huge patch, only to provide two lines of text. Doing so is an enormous waste of resources, bandwith, and people's time. Everyone single person on the CC: list and the various mailing lists had to consume this entire patch a second time, just to see these two small lines of text you wanted to add. Are you even aware of the ramifications of your actions at all? If this lack of consideration extends to your actual coding as well, I very much dread reviewing your work. Please be incredibly more considerate and thoughtful with your email etiquette, or I will just plain flat out ignore your patch submissions entirely. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists