[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF+7xWmmuf0bSROpvd+2RW-XFV=_nf6Zu3KC9-hW2rWDwVwncg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:27:32 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] regulator: core: Add checking n_voltages if using
list_voltage() to read voltage regulators
2012/8/10 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:32:33AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> Use list_voltage() to read single voltage regulators should be only applied to
>> single voltage regulators, thus add checking n_voltages for this case.
>
> We should be failing to register these regulators in the first place, or
> at least complaining extremely loudly about them.
Oh. My original intention is to prevent using list_voltage() to read
voltage regulators for the case "n_voltages > 1" in case of both get_voltage
and get_voltage_sel are not implemented.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists