linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] regulator: core: Add checking n_voltages if using list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120810122903.GJ24328@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:29:03 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] regulator: core: Add checking n_voltages if using
 list_voltage() to read voltage regulators

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:27:32PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2012/8/10 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:

> > We should be failing to register these regulators in the first place, or
> > at least complaining extremely loudly about them.

> Oh. My original intention is to prevent using list_voltage() to read
> voltage regulators for the case "n_voltages > 1" in case of both get_voltage
> and get_voltage_sel are not implemented.

Yes, I see the intention - what I'm saying is that a regulator like that
makes no sense in the first place.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/