[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120810014119.GD19617@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:41:22 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>
CC: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...esi-usa.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efikamx: reintroduce Genesi Efika MX Smarttop via device
tree
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:29:39AM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
> The reason the new kernel depends on the new U-Boot is we're trying to
> do all pinmux configuration in U-Boot (and we do in-house, and it
> works). No pinctrl stuff in the kernel or device tree is required at
> this point. The Old Kernel will remux a few things redundantly or
> change drive strengths or whatever or add hysteresis to the UART port
> which is not board-burning but is not really necessary, but it will
> work. The new kernel will just be able to do what it does out of the
> box, which is how it should be (hence why I object to adding pinctrl
> setup...)
>
Then I will have to refuse to accept your patch, because I'm working on
a series to remove pinctrl_provide_dummies() from imx51_dt_init().
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists