[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344562886.6935.93.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:41:26 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracepoints: Move the work out of line from
hotpath sections
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 16:54 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 04:16 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 08/09/2012 03:25 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It might be better to improve gcc to move really cold branches out of
> >>> line (really, really far away), and use the compiler to do this, rather
> >>> than to use an extra indirection that adds bloat and complexity to the
> >>> kernel.
>
> Oh, you mean like: -freorder-blocks-and-partition
Actually, what would be really nice is to place a block in a section of
your choice. Something like:
if (unlikely(x)) __attribute__((section(".unlikely"))) {
/* code here will be in the ".unlikely" section */
}
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists