[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF8JNhJVUitsxQXTZAMSszzXXb_QG2oxVTdcJN40JTycmQNOrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:06:45 -0700
From: Ping Cheng <pinglinux@...il.com>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] Input: Improve the events-per-packet estimate
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se> wrote:
> Hi Ping,
>
> Long time no see. :-)
>
>> > + /* Make room for KEY and MSC events */
>> > + events += 7;
>>
>> It is nice to get rid of the redundant pieces and to incorporate
>> common functions. Thank you.
>>
>> I have a question about the code above though. Why do we use 7
>> instead of going through the keys like:
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < KEY_MAX; i++)
>> if (test_bit(i, dev->keybit))
>> events++;
>
> Keyboards register a large amount of different keys, but seldom send
> more than one or two at a time. The value 7 is ad hoc, admittedly, but
> it makes the default buffer 8 bytes, which happens to precisely match
> the default buffer in evdev.
That can be a valid reason until we need to report more keys
simultaneously. Please update the comments so we know why we end up
with 7.
Thank you.
Ping
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists