linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1345038181.2750.20.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:42:58 -0400
From:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@...com>,
	linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs

On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 10:36 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > -#define L1_CACHE_BYTES        L2_CACHE_BYTES
> > +#define L1_CACHE_SHIFT        L2_CACHE_SHIFT
> > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES        (1 << L2_CACHE_SHIFT)
> 
> Nitpick: the last line could better be:
> 
> +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES        (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>

Yes, I noticed that after sending the patch.

Should I push this through the c6x tree?

--Mark


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/