| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:12:33 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@...com>, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:42:58AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 10:36 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > -#define L1_CACHE_BYTES L2_CACHE_BYTES > > > +#define L1_CACHE_SHIFT L2_CACHE_SHIFT > > > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L2_CACHE_SHIFT) > > > > Nitpick: the last line could better be: > > > > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT) > > > > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> > > Yes, I noticed that after sending the patch. > > Should I push this through the c6x tree? That'd be good. For consistency, will you also include the GENERIC_ATOMIC64 chunk in the titled patch? I can send Andrew an updated series (reducing the c6x changes, and possibly the score/unicore32 bits) later on. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists