[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120815141233.GA32389@localhost>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:12:33 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@...com>,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:42:58AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 10:36 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > -#define L1_CACHE_BYTES L2_CACHE_BYTES
> > > +#define L1_CACHE_SHIFT L2_CACHE_SHIFT
> > > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L2_CACHE_SHIFT)
> >
> > Nitpick: the last line could better be:
> >
> > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>
> Yes, I noticed that after sending the patch.
>
> Should I push this through the c6x tree?
That'd be good. For consistency, will you also include the
GENERIC_ATOMIC64 chunk in the titled patch?
I can send Andrew an updated series (reducing the c6x changes, and
possibly the score/unicore32 bits) later on.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists