[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208151616.01114.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:16:00 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/31] arm64: DMA mapping API
On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> +static struct dma_map_ops arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> + .alloc = arm64_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
> + .free = arm64_swiotlb_free_coherent,
> + .map_page = arm64_swiotlb_map_page,
> + .unmap_page = arm64_swiotlb_unmap_page,
> + .map_sg = arm64_swiotlb_map_sg_attrs,
> + .unmap_sg = arm64_swiotlb_unmap_sg_attrs,
> + .sync_single_for_cpu = arm64_swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu,
> + .sync_single_for_device = arm64_swiotlb_sync_single_for_device,
> + .sync_sg_for_cpu = arm64_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu,
> + .sync_sg_for_device = arm64_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device,
> + .dma_supported = swiotlb_dma_supported,
> + .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
> +};
> +
> +void __init swiotlb_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size, int verbose);
> +
> +void __init arm64_swiotlb_init(size_t max_size)
> +{
> + dma_ops = &arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops;
> + swiotlb_init_with_default_size(min((size_t)SZ_64M, max_size), 1);
> +}
Why is swiotlb the default? I would expect that most devices can in fact
use the entire 64 bit address space, so you can use a simple linear
implementation for those.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists