| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:19:11 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...il.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@...ote.com>,
Zhangjin Wu <wuzhangjin@...il.com>,
Hongliang Tao <taohl@...ote.com>, Hua Yan <yanh@...ote.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 09/18] MIPS: Loongson: Add swiotlb to support big
memory (>4GB).
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:54:47PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
>> > +static void *loongson_dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>> > + dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>> > +{
>> > + void *ret;
>> > +
>> > + if (dma_alloc_from_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, &ret))
>> > + return ret;
>> > +
>> > + /* ignore region specifiers */
>> > + gfp &= ~(__GFP_DMA | __GFP_DMA32 | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
>> > +
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
>> > + if (dev == NULL)
>> > + gfp |= __GFP_DMA;
>>
>> When would this happen? dev == NULL?
>
> A legacy (ISA) device driver. Some of the Loongsons have some kind of
> southbridge which incorporates legacy devices though of the top of my
> head I'm not sure which if any of these are actually being used. Huacai?
ISA driver isn't used now, but I think keep "dev == NULL" here has no
side effect.
BTW, "dev == NULL" only happend in ISA case? I use "grep
pci_alloc_consistent drivers/ -rwI | grep NULL" and also get some
lines.
>
>> > + else if (dev->coherent_dma_mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(24))
>> > + gfp |= __GFP_DMA;
>> > + else
>> > +#endif
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
>> > + if (dev->coherent_dma_mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
>> > + gfp |= __GFP_DMA32;
>> > + else
>>
>> Why the 'else'
>> > +#endif
>> > + ;
>>
>> why?
>> > + gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY;
>> > +
>> > + ret = swiotlb_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp);
>> > + mb();
>>
>> Why the 'mb()' ? Can you just do
>> return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(...)
>>
>> > + return ret;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void loongson_dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>> > + void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>> > +{
>> > + int order = get_order(size);
>> > +
>> > + if (dma_release_from_coherent(dev, order, vaddr))
>> > + return;
>> > +
>> > + swiotlb_free_coherent(dev, size, vaddr, dma_handle);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static dma_addr_t loongson_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>> > + unsigned long offset, size_t size,
>> > + enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> > + struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>> > +{
>> > + dma_addr_t daddr = swiotlb_map_page(dev, page, offset, size,
>> > + dir, attrs);
>> > + mb();
>>
>> Please do 'return swiotlb_map_page(..)'..
>>
>> But if you are doing that why don't you just set the dma_ops.map_page = swiotlb_map_page
>> ?
>>
>>
>> > + return daddr;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int loongson_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>> > + int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> > + struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>> > +{
>> > + int r = swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(dev, sg, nents, dir, NULL);
>> > + mb();
>> > +
>> > + return r;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void loongson_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev,
>> > + dma_addr_t dma_handle, size_t size,
>> > + enum dma_data_direction dir)
>> > +{
>> > + swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(dev, dma_handle, size, dir);
>> > + mb();
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void loongson_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
>> > + struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
>> > + enum dma_data_direction dir)
>> > +{
>> > + swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(dev, sg, nents, dir);
>> > + mb();
>> > +}
>> > +
>>
>> I am not really sure why you have these extra functions, when you could
>> just modify the dma_ops to point to the swiotlb ones
>>
>> > +static dma_addr_t loongson_unity_phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
>> > +{
>> > + return (paddr < 0x10000000) ?
>> > + (paddr | 0x0000000080000000) : paddr;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static phys_addr_t loongson_unity_dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr)
>> > +{
>> > + return (daddr < 0x90000000 && daddr >= 0x80000000) ?
>> > + (daddr & 0x0fffffff) : daddr;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +struct loongson_dma_map_ops {
>> > + struct dma_map_ops dma_map_ops;
>> > + dma_addr_t (*phys_to_dma)(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr);
>> > + phys_addr_t (*dma_to_phys)(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr);
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +dma_addr_t phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
>> > +{
>> > + struct loongson_dma_map_ops *ops = container_of(get_dma_ops(dev),
>> > + struct loongson_dma_map_ops, dma_map_ops);
>> > +
>> > + return ops->phys_to_dma(dev, paddr);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr)
>> > +{
>> > + struct loongson_dma_map_ops *ops = container_of(get_dma_ops(dev),
>> > + struct loongson_dma_map_ops, dma_map_ops);
>> > +
>> > + return ops->dma_to_phys(dev, daddr);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int loongson_dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>> > +{
>> > + /* Loongson doesn't support DMA above 32-bit */
>> > + if (mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
>> > + return -EIO;
>> > +
>> > + *dev->dma_mask = mask;
>> > +
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static struct loongson_dma_map_ops loongson_linear_dma_map_ops = {
>> > + .dma_map_ops = {
>> > + .alloc = loongson_dma_alloc_coherent,
>> > + .free = loongson_dma_free_coherent,
>> > + .map_page = loongson_dma_map_page,
>>
>> But why not 'swiotlb_map_page'?
>>
>> > + .unmap_page = swiotlb_unmap_page,
>> > + .map_sg = loongson_dma_map_sg,
>> > + .unmap_sg = swiotlb_unmap_sg_attrs,
>> > + .sync_single_for_cpu = swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu,
>> > + .sync_single_for_device = loongson_dma_sync_single_for_device,
>> > + .sync_sg_for_cpu = swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu,
>> > + .sync_sg_for_device = loongson_dma_sync_sg_for_device,
>> > + .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
>> > + .dma_supported = swiotlb_dma_supported,
>> > + .set_dma_mask = loongson_dma_set_mask
>> > + },
>> > + .phys_to_dma = loongson_unity_phys_to_dma,
>> > + .dma_to_phys = loongson_unity_dma_to_phys
>>
>> Why do you need these? I am not seeing it being used here by any external code?
>>
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
>> > +{
>> > + swiotlb_init(1);
>> > + mips_dma_map_ops = &loongson_linear_dma_map_ops.dma_map_ops;
>> > +}
>> > diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c b/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c
>> > index 3fab204..122f4f8 100644
>> > --- a/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c
>> > +++ b/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c
>> > @@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ static inline int cpu_is_noncoherent_r10000(struct device *dev)
>> > current_cpu_type() == CPU_R12000);
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static inline int cpu_is_noncoherent_loongson(struct device *dev)
>> > +{
>> > + return !plat_device_is_coherent(dev) &&
>> > + (current_cpu_type() == CPU_LOONGSON2 ||
>> > + current_cpu_type() == CPU_LOONGSON3);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static gfp_t massage_gfp_flags(const struct device *dev, gfp_t gfp)
>> > {
>> > gfp_t dma_flag;
>> > @@ -209,7 +216,7 @@ static inline void __dma_sync(struct page *page,
>> > static void mips_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
>> > size_t size, enum dma_data_direction direction, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>> > {
>> > - if (cpu_is_noncoherent_r10000(dev))
>> > + if (cpu_is_noncoherent_r10000(dev) || cpu_is_noncoherent_loongson(dev))
>
> Why this? I hope you're not claiming the Loongson has the same very weird
> behaviour as the R10000 in a non-coherent system. No sane CPU should ...
This can be removed on Loongson, thank you.
>
> Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists