[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208171140.50388.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:40:50 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: dedekind1@...il.com
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: LPC32xx: Provide DMA filter callbacks via platform data
On Friday 17 August 2012, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Show Details
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:01 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > To later avoid collisions on subsystem merge, can you please leave the
> > > patch with arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/phy3250.c for arm-soc.git? (I will
> > > provide a pull request for Arnd and Olof, as usual.)
> >
> > Only if Arnd insists. Otherwise I'd prefer to resolve collisions (they
> > cannot be hard with this patch) than pulling the soc tree to the mtd
> > tree.
>
> Actually the mtd patches do not compile-depend on it, sorry, I am
> dropping it from the MTD tree. Thanks!
For reference, I'm fine with either outcome, I don't mind seeing an
occasional collision with subsystem trees, as they tend to be trivial
to resolve.
If you split a series to go through multiple git trees, you have to
ensure that both halves are actually regression free by themselves,
which typically ends up being much harder than fixing a small merge
conflict.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists