linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: LPC32xx: Provide DMA filter callbacks via platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <502E2EDB.2050200@antcom.de>
Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:45:31 +0200
From:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	dedekind1@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: LPC32xx: Provide DMA filter callbacks via platform
 data

On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Actually the mtd patches do not compile-depend on it, sorry, I am
>> dropping it from the MTD tree. Thanks!
> 
> For reference, I'm fine with either outcome, I don't mind seeing an
> occasional collision with subsystem trees, as they tend to be trivial
> to resolve.
> 
> If you split a series to go through multiple git trees, you have to
> ensure that both halves are actually regression free by themselves,

Of course. But in this very case, they are. So I'd prefer pushing them
via different trees because I have other patches for mach-lpc32xx in the
queue and would like to minimize work for you. :-)

Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/