[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120817134039.GB11439@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:40:39 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti@...fo.org>,
Kernel hackers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ext4 hackers <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, maze@...gle.com,
"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:09:15PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Ted,
>
> I find ext4 write performance dropped by 3.3% on average in the
> 3.6-rc1 merge window. xfs and btrfs are fine.
>
> Two machines are tested. The performance regression happens in the
> lkp-nex04 machine, which is equipped with 12 SSD drives. lkp-st02 does
> not see regression, which is equipped with HDD drives. I'll continue
> to repeat the tests and report variations.
Hmm... I've checked out the commits in "git log v3.5..v3.6-rc1 --
fs/ext4 fs/jbd2" and I don't see anything that I would expect would
cause that. The are the lock elimination changes for Direct I/O
overwrites, but that shouldn't matter for your tests which are
measuring buffered writes, correct?
Is there any chance you could do me a favor and do a git bisect
restricted to commits involving fs/ext4 and fs/jbd2?
Many thanks,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists