[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208200645.38047.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:45:37 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>,
"thierry.reding@...onic-design.de" <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-lm3530: replace pwm platform functions with generic pwm functions
On Monday 20 August 2012, Kim, Milo wrote:
> > * I don't understand why you need the "if (rvdata->pwm) return 0;" case.
> > It's normally better to do the initialization exactly once from the
> > probe() function. You might want to return -EPROBE_DEFER if the pwm
> > source is not yet available though.
>
> This device has 3 control mode. - register access, sensor input and PWM input.
> One of modes can be selected on-the-fly.
> So that's why I add code which returning 0 when PWM device exists.
> Whenever mode change occurs from/to 'PWM input', pwm_request() and pwm_free() should be called.
In that case, I would recommend changing it from
+ /* if the pwm device exists, skip requesting the device */
+ if (drvdata->pwm)
+ return 0;
to
/* warn if the PWM was not released prior to reneabling it */
WARN_ON(drvdata->pwm);
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists