[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50327242.80103@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:52:10 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dt: tegra: harmony: add regulators
On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:25 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:27 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/17/2012 12:59 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> Harmony uses a TPS6586x regulator. Instantiate this, and hook up a
>>> couple of fixed GPIO-controlled regulators too.
>>>
>>> Based on Ventana regulator patch by Stephen Warren<swarren@...dia.com>
>>> and converted to Harmony.
>> Thanks, applied to Tegra's for-3.7/dt branch.
> Oh hang on, this adds regulators to DT, but doesn't do anything to
> remove the board-file registration of Harmony's regulators from
> board-dt-tegra20.c, which end up conflicting, and preventing the PCIe
> driver from being registered.
>
> So, this patch really wants to remove the legacy code to, but doing so
> will be problematic; to avoid runtime git bisect failures, we'd need to
> merge the regulator tree in first, or wait until next kernel release or
> something... Thoughts?
Why not just remove the regulator registration from board files along
with the dt entry (in one patch). That will resolve the issue of bisect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists