linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/11] pinctrl: mvebu: add pinctrl driver for Armada 370

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:01:51 +0200
From:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] pinctrl: mvebu: add pinctrl driver for Armada 370

On 08/20/2012 07:36 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> In order to keep the consistency with other SoC families, maybe we can
> split the 370 and XP options in two separate MACH_ARMADA_370 and
> MACH_ARMADA_XP. So, in the ideal world, once all Marvell EBU SoCs are
> converted to DT+mach-mvebu, we should have:
>
>   *) arch/arm/Kconfig defines MACH_MVEBU
>
>   *) arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig defines MACH_KIRKWOOD, MACH_DOVE,
>      MACH_MX78X00, MACH_ARMADA_370, MACH_ARMADA_XP, MACH_ORION5X
>
> Then, an user is free to build a single kernel image that supports all,
> or a selection of the supported Marvell EBU SoCs.
>
> Would that be ok with you?

Yes!

> If that's fine with you, then I would prefer if we keep the single
> MACH_ARMADA_370_XP symbol for now, so that your pinctrl set of patches
> does not depend on something else. We would do the small Kconfig option
> refactoring as a follow-up set of patches. Thoughts?

Despite any objections, I will remove all arch/arm/*/Kconfig patches
from pinctrl patch set.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/