[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120821221908.GD19185@fieldses.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:19:08 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jim Rees <rees@...ch.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strings: helper for maximum decimal encoding of an
unsigned integer
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:06:13PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:22:27PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> > J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
> >
> > I've seen a couple examples recently where we've gotten this wrong.
> > Maybe something like this would help? Is there some better way?
> >
> > (Approximation due to Jim Rees).
> >
> > Please add Suggested-by: Jim Rees <rees@...ch.edu>. I'm thinking of
> > patenting the algorithm.
>
> Is that a joke? Patenting the fact that log10(256) is 2.408..., which
> is about 2.4, which is 24/10? I really hope we are Poe'd... BTW, NAK
> the comment - s/36/26/ in there; check it yourself -
> $ echo '2^(8*27)' | bc
> 105312291668557186697918027683670432318895095400549111254310977536
> which is 66-digit, not 65 as the estimate would be.
Erp, you're right.
Anyway, does something like base10len(type) seem reasonable? Or define
macros that enumerate the sizes? (ULONG_STR_MAX or something?)
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists