[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120822234057.GR19212@google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit
UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1
This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of
WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
index 9cf7dfe..a55ca7a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
@@ -1536,11 +1536,9 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
*
* All tasks on the workqueue are expected to acquire the dev mutex
* so there is no point in running more than one instance of the
- * workqueue at any time: max_active = 1 and NON_REENTRANT.
+ * workqueue at any time. Use an ordered one.
*/
- dev_priv->wq = alloc_workqueue("i915",
- WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_NON_REENTRANT,
- 1);
+ dev_priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915", 0);
if (dev_priv->wq == NULL) {
DRM_ERROR("Failed to create our workqueue.\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists