[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345708607_3773@CP5-2952>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:56:37 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of
> WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists