lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <503576AB.5030208@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:17:47 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, mmarek@...e.cz,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, JBeulich@...e.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 74/74] lto, workaround: Mark do_futex noinline to prevent
 clobbering ebp

On 08/18/2012 07:57 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> On a 32bit build gcc 4.7 with LTO decides to clobber the 6th argument on the
> stack.  Unfortunately this corrupts the user EBP and leads to later crashes.
> For now mark do_futex noinline to prevent this.
> 
> I wish there was a generic way to handle this. Seems like a ticking time
> bomb problem.
> 

There is a generic way to handle this.  This is actually a bug in Linux
that has been known for at least 15 years and which we keep hacking around.

The right thing to do is to change head_32.S to not violate the i386
ABI.  Arguments pushed (by value) on the stack are property of the
callee, that is, they are volatile, so the hack of making them do double
duty as both being saved and passed as arguments is just plain bogus.
The problem is that it works "just well enough" that people (including
myself) keep hacking around it with hacks like this, with assembly
macros, and whatnot instead of fixing the root cause.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ