[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50361AEA.6010807@linlab.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:58:34 +0200
From: Alex Bergmann <alex@...lab.net>
To: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkjerry.chu@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments
On 08/22/2012 06:41 PM, H.K. Jerry Chu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alex Bergmann <alex@...lab.net
> <mailto:alex@...lab.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but it looks like I found an RFC mismatch with the
> current default values of the TCP implementation.
>
> Alex
>
> From 8b854a525eb45f64ad29dfab16f9d9f681e84495 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexander Bergmann <alex@...lab.net <mailto:alex@...lab.net>>
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:29:08 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments
>
> Commit 9ad7c049 changed the initRTO from 3secs to 1sec in accordance to
> RFC6298 (former RFC2988bis). This introduced a gap with RFC1122 that
> defines a minimum retransmission window for SYN segments of at least
> 180secs.
>
> Prior to 9ad7c049 the timeout was defined with 189secs. Now we have only
> a timeout of 63secs.
>
> ((2 << 5) - 1) * 3 secs = 189 secs
> ((2 << 5) - 1) * 1 secs = 63 secs
>
> To fulfill the MUST constraint in RFC1122 section 4.2.3.5 about R2 for
> SYN segments, the values of TCP_SYN_RETRIES and TCP_SYNACK_RETRIES must
> be changed to 7 reties.
>
> ((2 << 7) - 1) * 1 secs = 255 secs
>
> This would result in an ETIMEDOUT of 4 minutes 15 seconds.
>
>
> This issue occurred to me right after I submitted the patch for RFC6298.
> I did not commit any more change because RFC compliance aside, 180secs
> just seem like eternity in the Internet age.
>
> (See my past post on this at
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130759078118866&w=2)
Okay, I missed that post during my search about the current situation.
Thanks,
Alex
> Jerry
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Bergmann <alex@...lab.net
> <mailto:alex@...lab.net>>
> ---
> include/net/tcp.h | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index 1f000ff..7eaae19 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -98,10 +98,10 @@ extern void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int
> state, int timeo);
> * 15 is ~13-30min depending on RTO.
> */
>
> -#define TCP_SYN_RETRIES 5 /* number of times to retry
> active opening a
> +#define TCP_SYN_RETRIES 7 /* number of times to retry
> active opening a
> * connection: ~180sec is RFC
> minimum */
>
> -#define TCP_SYNACK_RETRIES 5 /* number of times to retry passive
> opening a
> +#define TCP_SYNACK_RETRIES 7 /* number of times to retry passive
> opening a
> * connection: ~180sec is RFC
> minimum */
>
> #define TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN (60*HZ) /* how long to wait to destroy
> TIME-WAIT
> --
> 1.7.8.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> <mailto:majordomo@...r.kernel.org>
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
|. _ | _ |_ _ _ _|_
||| ||(_||_).| |(/_ |
email/sip/xmpp: alex@...lab.net
phone/enum: +49 2871 2355378
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists